	Member login		Contact us		Join NN

January 27, 2011

Minutes of NW Neighborhood Networks Mtg Jan. 10, 2011

Eighth District Race Remains in Forefront

By David Schogel, Connie Bille, Stan Shapiro

The Potluck meeting began promptly at 6PM. David Schogel provided a brief overview of what happened at the last Neighborhood Network meeting that was held at Germantown Y on December 12th. He explained that today’s agenda is a continuation of that December 12th meeting and that minutes were mailed to all those with email address. Those that received phone calls as a method to invite them to tonight’s meeting are referred to the PhillyNN.com web site and that there were a limited number of minutes available for those who wanted them this evening.

Tonight’s meeting followed the same format of folks dividing themselves into the 3 sub-group for topics discussions on 12-12. David Schogel summarized what happened in Subgroup 1, Stan Shapiro summarized what had occurred in Group 2 and Connie Bille summarized what had happened in Subgroup 3. David pointed out that after the 3 Subgroups meet this evening we would reconvene as a large group and hear what the 3 Subgroups discussed and decided. Minutes would be written and again sent out to all 350 members on our email and phone lists....

Summary of Group 1 discussion: 8th District Candidates

We discussed all of the potential candidates identified at our December meeting. We agreed that money and potential votes and volunteer workers is what influences candidates to stick with their plans to run or drop out. We acknowledged that discussing the possibility of fund raising without having identified a candidate was difficult but when asked for a show of hands of who would be willing to make a commitment to raise $50 each for an as yet unidentified candidate, 10 people in the room raised their hands (10 times $50 is a potential $500 to start with). No final decision was made on the issue of fund raising.
We did raise the question, “How realistic it was that most of the 9 potential candidates would drop out?” We decided that of all the candidates whose names have been mentioned, 3 stand out as possible person for us to consider for endorsement. They are Greg Paulmier, Cindy Bass and Verna Tyner. Our Subgroup decided that we should follow several strategies. First our NWNN Steering Committee could be trusted to as a group of 6 to represent our group in contacting the 3 candidates for an informal interview ASAP and that the information and impressions of our leadership group should report back to us at our next meeting. We wanted the NWNN Steering Committee to be diverse geographically and racially representative our area and membership. The idea is to have a dialog and get a better reading of each candidate, their strengths, weaknesses, ideology and priorities for our 8th District. Our questions should be considered in advance with input from our other Subgroups. In addition to requesting these informal small group meetings with the3 candidates, we still thought it would be good to ask them to later submit to a formal questionnaire that would be posted on our NN website, and to also have a Meet the Candidates’ night. This process should help us to get a good feel for each of the candidates and a basis for us to come up with an endorsement we can all agree upon.
We think we can make a commitment to our endorsed candidate to help raise funds, field an organization of door to door canvassers, create a phone bank and field workers on election day to get out the vote. We think we can come up with 300 active volunteers. We debated if we should request that the candidates not selected be encouraged to drop out of the race.

Summary of Group 2 discussion: Proposed NN City Council Platform

The Committee considered the draft Platform in detail, and it proposed changes which Stan Shapiro agreed to incorporate. Robyn Tevah suggested that the draft be reformatted and shortened, and volunteered to draft a revision along those lines. It was agreed that the existing draft, including the changes specifically offered at the meeting, would be distributed to the list with a request for comments. Further changes that get substantial support will be included before a final Platform is adopted.
I. Government Transparency accessibility and accountability
A) Elected officials should maintain an office in the district so their constituents have more direct access.
B) Decisions about large funding streams shall require community input to make sure they benefit the local community. Funding of CDC’s, and other quasi-governmental organizations, shall be approved by City Council after public hearing and subjected to regular financial and performance auditing. Audits shall be published on the City website and subject to public hearings when requested by affected residents, communities or advocacy groups.
C) All meetings of government and quasi-public bodies shall be widely publicized in local as well as citywide media, with substantial advance notice, and held at convenient times and locations. Any changes in zoning shall require public input, prior to submission to City Council. Local neighborhood groups shall be informed of proposed changes in a timely manner.
II. Create More Housing Opportunities
A) Reorganize the acquisition and distribution of abandoned houses in the City. The City needs a single agency to be in charge of acquiring, disposing and rehabilitating abandoned homes that blight communities across the District and the City.
B) Funding streams must be developed that enable local residents to acquire abandoned properties, rehabilitate them employing local residents to the extent possible to do the work, and maintain them as their primary residence.
C) Developers should be compelled to contribute funding into a linked development fund to build low-income housing or renovate existing housing.
III. Funding Essential City Services Fully and Fairly
A) Reform the Business Privilege Tax to Raise Money for Services. The Business Privilege Tax can and should be restructured so that it exempts tens of thousands of small businesses from the tax entirely, and brings in a much higher proportion of the tax from out of city big businesses. While making the tax more fair and wide-ranging in this manner, the City should use it to raise more revenue to fund essential services.
B) Go after tax delinquents. A website should be maintained of serious City tax delinquents who clearly have the resources to pay.
C) Make Major Non Profits Pay for Services. Major nonprofits like Penn and Temple should be compelled to pay service fees in lieu of taxes to fund their fair share of services. Their for-profit leasing activities should be audited and fully taxed.

IV. Jobs and Economic Development
A) Reform PIDC. PIDC is the major economic development agent for the City. It must be reformed in the following manner:
1) its board should be reconstituted to have a majority of public and community representatives rather than Chamber of Commerce representatives;
2) its proceedings should be transparent and public;
3) it should require hiring of Philadelphia residents as a condition to its loans and grants;
4) it should recover any loans and grants given on the condition that new workers be hired if those hires don’t take place;
5) it should have a priority to finance environmentally sustainable jobs that pay a living wage;
B) Give City Workers the right to bid on contracts. City unions should be allowed to bid on all new and renewing contracts to provide opportunities for public employees earning living wages and living in Philadelphia to obtain jobs at lower cost to the City;
V. Invest locally: Pension Fund Reform
A) Recoup losses due to advisor malfeasance. The Pension Board should investigate whether any of its losses since 2007 are the result of fraud or conflict of interest on the part of any of its investment advisors, or as a result of any recommended investment choices. Any advisors found to have acted contrary to their fiduciary duties should be sued for restitution and fired.
B) Adopt pro-Philadelphia, and socially progressive investment policies. The City should apply its Pension Fund Power to spur investment in the City and to deter negative behavior. For instance:
1) A specific percentage of the fund should be made available, and an investment advisor should be hired, to help support promising in-City investments:
2) Investments should be withdrawn from any company engaged in Marcellus Shale drilling that fails to disclose the chemicals it uses in the process.
C) Vote shares to promote progressive corporate values. By virtue of the City’s ownership of stock in major corporations, it gets to vote on issues of corporate policy and governance. The City should do so to promote policies that advance the interests of sustainability, of social and economic justice, and of Philadelphia residents.

VI. Inclusive Planning
A) Government should promote community-based redevelopment that is planned and executed in an inclusive and democratic manner. Redevelopment projects should be acceptable to local communities and should employ local contractors and workers.
B) Curb City tax abatements. They are now handed out like candy to almost any person or business that builds anything. They should be limited to areas that are deteriorated and where it’s clear that otherwise little or no new construction would take place.
VII. Environment and Jobs
A) Green employment opportunities should be expanded. City pension funds should be used to provide weatherization financing across the City, and other City nonprofit institutions should be encouraged to invest portions of their endowments and pension funds to similar ends.
B) Retailers should be prohibited from packing goods in non-biodegradable plastic bags.
C) Adopt a progressive food policy. The City should increase purchases of locally produced produce, and stop buying genetically modified foods, for prisoners and nursing home residents. The School District should do the same.
D) Making PGW an asset, rather than a liability. PGW should issue bonds to finance solar and insulation projects that reduce fossil fuel consumption in the City. If within its legal rights, it should extend this assistance to suburban homeowners and businesses as well.
VIII. Campaign Finance Reform
A) Council should enact a program for public financing of primary and general election campaigns for City Council and Mayor
B) The Charter should be amended to permit city worker participation in political campaigns on their own time.
IX. Criminal Justice Reform
A) Reduce the jail population. Although Philly’s crime rate has stayed relatively stable over the past decade, its jail population jumped 49% from 1999-2009. More individuals convicted of minor property crimes should be diverted away from the prison system toward programs that will rehabilitate them. Prison funding should be reduced in stages to force reduction in prison population.
B) End the City’s cooperation with ICE. The City should stop referring the names of persons arrested to the ICE
C) End Stop and Frisk. The Police Department should terminate its stop and frisk program. Police must be well trained to avoid other forms of misconduct, and quickly and severely punished when it occurs.
X. Health care
A) Make health care affordable to City residents and businesses. Creative ways to cover city residents for health care should be looked at, such as development of a cooperative model for providing health care coverage, and using the City’s power as a customer of Blue Cross/Blue Shield to influence the design of the products it makes available to all of its customers.
B) Adopt a mandatory sick leave policy. Council should enact bill 080474 now pending before City Council, requiring businesses to provide employees with paid sick leave;
C) Make day care available to more working parents. Council should investigate ways to require or encourage more onsite day care centers for employees of City businesses.
XI. Education.
Take back control of the School District. The School District was removed from local control ten years ago due to its inability to put its fiscal house in order. It is now in worse fiscal shape than when it was taken. Local control should be restored immediately.

Summary of Group 3 discussion: Election Day Field Organization

Group 3 met to plan a way to field a strong organization for Election Day in May
We began by noting that with the change of time and day of week for this meeting, few of the people at the first meeting were there for continuity, so the first thing we did was record who was in this group: Conni Bille, Maggie McCourt, Dennis Brunn, Greg Paulmier, Rosa Lee Jones, Lillian Paulmier, Rudy Steward Jr., Dave Bell, John Vago.
Conni explained that in the first meeting we expressed the need to first concentrate on voter registration. There was concern that after the Republicans managed to de-fund Acorn, there was not an on-going voter registration program, and that registration was a very important factor in voter turnout and Philadelphia’s subsequent power to influence whether Pennsylvania remained a “blue” state.

The previous group had determined that we would distribute Voter Registration forms by approaching local places (libraries, book stores, fitness centers, day care centers, retirement communities, etc) willing to distribute information on how to complete the form and collect completed forms for us to submit. Dennis volunteered to create a 1-page guide on how to complete the form and Greg Paulmier offered to research what to say if someone asked what it meant if they checked off “I do not have a Pennsylvania Driver’s License or a Social Security card.” This is a new item that was not on previous Voter Registration forms. Does this mean they are not eligible to vote?

When the group reconvenes we will organize some outdoor Voter Registration days. After the candidates are all confirmed and we go through an endorsement process, we will focus on distributing literature for the “ballot” that we endorse.

Next Meetings Scheduled